Lavawall® vs Hyperproof

How Lavawall® stacks up against Hyperproof for GRC platform, with the criteria that matter to MSPs and lean IT teams.

Hyperproof is a mature compliance-program-management platform. Strong on policy and program structure, control libraries, and evidence-tracking workflows. Used heavily by mid-market enterprises with dedicated GRC teams.

Where Hyperproof is comparatively weaker: direct endpoint and cloud evidence collection. Hyperproof lives downstream of evidence collected by other tools (RMMs, EDRs, identity systems). For an MSP delivering compliance as a service, that means stitching Hyperproof together with separate endpoint, cloud, and identity tooling.

Lavawall® is multi-tenant GRC plus the underlying evidence collection. The same agent that performs patching, configuration assessment, and breach detection produces the compliance evidence — no separate tooling stitching required.

Where Lavawall® wins for MSPs

Lavawall® is the evidence engine and the compliance program management together. Hyperproof typically requires separate tools (RMM, EDR, identity, MDM, app control) to feed it; Lavawall® collects evidence natively and maps it to controls in one platform.

Multi-tenant by design is the second differentiator. For MSPs delivering compliance as a service across many client tenants, Lavawall® was designed for that workflow from day one.

Canadian and MSP-relevant frameworks (CPCSC, BC HIA, Alberta HIA, the Canadian privacy bundle, NERC CIP, IIROC, CPA Canada, Australian Essential Eight) sit alongside CMMC 2.0, NIST, SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and PCI DSS — without enterprise-grade Hyperproof pricing.

Where Hyperproof wins

Hyperproof is well regarded for the depth of program management — policy lifecycle, control libraries, audit-tracking workflows, evidence requests — at the enterprise scale.

For mid-market enterprises with dedicated GRC teams that already have evidence collection handled by separate tooling and need a sophisticated program-management layer, Hyperproof is mature.

Hyperproof's framework breadth at the enterprise tier is broader in some specialised areas than Lavawall's MSP-focused 15+.

Feature comparison

Feature Lavawall® Hyperproof
Compliance program management (policies, controls, workflows) Yes, with continuous evidence built in Mature
Multi-tenant for MSPs First-class Limited — typically per-org instances
Endpoint evidence collection (Windows, macOS, Linux) Native via Lavawall® agent Imports from third-party tools
Cloud evidence collection (M365 / Entra / Azure / Google Workspace) Native Imports from third-party connectors
Patching evidence Native (7,500+ applications) Imports from RMM
Application-control evidence Native (kernel-free) Imports from app-control vendor
Frameworks supported 15+ MSP-relevant frameworks (incl. Canadian) Many — enterprise breadth
System Security Plan (SSP) and remediation plan (POA&M) generation Yes, from live evidence Yes
Helpdesk + remote support bundled Yes (per-named-agent / browser-based) No
Cyber-insurance readiness reports Co-branded, automated Manual
Built and used by an audit firm ThreeShield (CISSP / CISA) No

Who should pick which?

Pick Lavawall® if…

MSPs delivering multi-tenant compliance-as-a-service across CMMC 2.0, NIST, SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and the Canadian privacy bundle.

Lean IT teams that want one platform for evidence collection, control mapping, and audit-ready reporting.

Pick Hyperproof if…

Mid-market enterprises with dedicated GRC teams running their own evidence collection and needing a program-management layer.

Frequently asked

Can Lavawall® feed Hyperproof?
Yes — via API. Some MSPs run Hyperproof for enterprise program management and Lavawall® for endpoint and cloud evidence collection across their MSP client tenants.
Does Lavawall® generate audit-ready evidence packages?
Yes. System Security Plans (SSPs), remediation plans (POA&Ms), and co-branded posture reports are generated from live evidence.