Lavawall® vs Liongard

How Lavawall® stacks up against Liongard for MSP attestation, with the criteria that matter to MSPs and lean IT teams.

Liongard is an MSP-focused attestation and configuration-discovery platform — automated daily snapshots of client environments, change tracking, and reporting on configuration drift. Used heavily by ConnectWise, Datto, and Kaseya MSPs to know what is in each tenant.

Lavawall® overlaps with Liongard on configuration discovery and reporting, with broader scope: 7,500+ application patching, 15+ framework GRC, multi-tenant cloud breach detection with endpoint correlation, kernel-free application control, replacement prioritization, smart helpdesk, and multi-tenant remote support.

For MSPs choosing between them, the question is whether configuration attestation alone is the priority (Liongard) or whether the broader security and compliance platform is the priority (Lavawall®).

Where Lavawall® wins for MSPs

Lavawall® is the broader platform — configuration attestation is one of many native capabilities, alongside patching, GRC, breach detection, application control, helpdesk, and remote support.

GRC framework mapping with continuous evidence collection is a step beyond Liongard's configuration-snapshot model.

Multi-tenant identity threat detection and response (ITDR) for M365 / Entra ID / Azure / Google Workspace with endpoint correlation is not Liongard's scope.

Where Liongard wins

Liongard's configuration-attestation depth is mature. The breadth of integrations it can pull configuration data from (firewalls, switches, M365 tenants, line-of-business apps) is a strength.

For MSPs whose primary need is configuration drift detection across many tenants and that have security and GRC tooling elsewhere, Liongard is a focused choice.

Feature comparison

Feature Lavawall® Liongard
Configuration attestation and change tracking Yes, plus broader posture Liongard core offering
Daily snapshot of client tenants Continuous Yes
7,500+ application patch catalog Yes No
GRC framework mapping (CMMC, NIST, SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO, etc.) 15+ frameworks with auditor-ready System Security Plan (SSP) and remediation plan (POA&M) Reports from configuration data
M365 / Entra / Azure breach detection Native multi-tenant identity threat detection and response (ITDR) Configuration-state focused
Google Workspace breach detection Native Configuration-state focused
Application control without kernel driver Native No
Curated SaaS / shadow-AI discovery (1,130+ catalog) Native No
Replacement prioritization Multi-factor scoring No
Smart helpdesk + remote support bundled Yes No
Built and used by an audit firm ThreeShield (CISSP / CISA) No

Who should pick which?

Pick Lavawall® if…

MSPs that want one platform for security, GRC, breach detection, patching, application control, helpdesk, and remote support.

Pick Liongard if…

MSPs whose primary need is configuration attestation across many tenants with GRC and breach detection handled separately.

Frequently asked

Can Lavawall® and Liongard coexist?
Yes. Some MSPs run Liongard for deep configuration-snapshot reporting and Lavawall® for the security and compliance platform layer.