Is GRC the same as SOC 2 readiness?

SOC 2 readiness is one type of GRC engagement. Full GRC also includes risk assessment, policy management, control testing, evidence collection, and continuous monitoring across whatever frameworks apply to the client (CMMC 2.0, NIST CSF, CIS, HIPAA, PCI DSS, PIPEDA, and so on).

Why is multi-tenant GRC important for MSPs?

A single-tenant GRC platform requires a separate workspace and re-configured integrations per client. A multi-tenant platform like Lavawall® lets the MSP onboard a tenant in minutes, push a standard control profile, and produce co-branded reports without manual re-mapping per client.

How do I choose a GRC tool for CMMC 2.0?

For CMMC 2.0 specifically, look for a platform that maps NIST SP 800-171 controls directly to your endpoint and cloud configuration evidence and produces a System Security Plan (SSP) and a Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) you can share with your C3PAO. See our dedicated guide to the best CMMC 2.0 software for MSPs.

Can a single platform handle MSP-internal GRC and client-facing GRC?

Yes. Lavawall® is used both ways. Many MSPs use the same platform for their own SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audit and for delivering compliance-as-a-service to their clients.

Best GRC tools for MSPs (2026)

Best GRC tools for MSPs

For MSP work, the top pick is a multi-tenant GRC platform that covers far more than SOC 2, collects its own endpoint and cloud evidence, and prices per tenant. On that test, Lavawall® leads for MSPs, MSSPs, and vCIOs, while single-tenant tools like Vanta and Drata suit one SaaS company chasing one audit. Judge any option on seven things: multi-tenant architecture, framework breadth, direct evidence collection, endpoint and cloud parity, white-label reporting, per-tenant economics, and audit-firm-grade methodology.

Start free, no credit card See the criteria

15+ frameworks · multi-tenant · endpoint and cloud evidence · native CAD billing

Choosing a GRC platform as an MSP is different from choosing one as a SaaS company. GRC stands for Governance, Risk, and Compliance: the work of mapping technical and process controls to a framework an auditor or regulator will recognise. A tool built for one company chasing one audit rarely fits an MSP delivering compliance across many client tenants.

What to look for

Seven things separate an MSP-ready GRC platform from a SaaS-aimed one.

Multi-tenant architecture

You need separate, isolated client orgs under one MSP console, not a separate workspace per client.

Framework breadth

SOC 2 and ISO 27001 are not enough for MSP work. Look for CMMC 2.0 (L1, L2), NIST CSF 2.0, NIST SP 800-171, CIS Controls v8, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and regional frameworks.

Direct evidence collection

Integration-only platforms are fragile. Every connector is a token to maintain. Prefer platforms that own the agent and cloud connectors directly.

Endpoint and cloud coverage parity

Your evidence has to come from Windows, macOS, and Linux endpoints and from M365, Entra ID, Azure, and Google Workspace.

White-label reporting

You need posture reports the client can show to their auditor, insurer, or board, branded accordingly.

Per-tenant economics

Per-tenant pricing scales with your business. Per-org subscriptions priced for SaaS companies do not.

Audit-firm-grade methodology

Prefer platforms designed by people who have actually delivered SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI, or HIPAA-readiness engagements.

Options to evaluate

Lavawall®

Multi-tenant MSP GRC platform with bundled endpoint and cloud monitoring.

Lavawall® is built for MSPs. It maps to 15+ frameworks (CMMC 2.0, CPCSC, NIST CSF, NIST 800-171, CIS, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, BC HIA, Alberta HIA, PIPEDA, NERC CIP, IIROC, CPA Canada, Essential Eight) and collects endpoint and cloud evidence with its own first-party agents and connectors. Designed by ThreeShield (CISSP and CISA staff). Native CAD billing.

Best when: MSPs, MSSPs, and vCIOs delivering compliance-as-a-service across many client tenants, especially in Canada, US, and Australian regulated industries.

Vanta

Single-tenant GRC for SaaS companies.

Polished, mature SOC 2 and ISO 27001 readiness platform. Strong startup-friendly UX, large library of SaaS connectors, established auditor relationships. Single-tenant architecture is a good fit for one company chasing one audit.

Best when: SaaS startups and tech companies with a single corporate scope chasing SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001.

Drata

Single-tenant GRC for SaaS companies.

Comparable scope to Vanta, with strong SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA readiness and broad SaaS integrations. Also single-tenant by design.

Best when: SaaS companies that prefer Drata's UX or whose investor or auditor specifically asks for it.

Secureframe / Hyperproof / Tugboat Logic

Single-tenant GRC platforms with varying focuses.

Each has its own niche. Hyperproof leans toward enterprise compliance program management, Secureframe overlaps Vanta's territory, and Tugboat focuses on policy automation. All are single-tenant by default.

Best when: Enterprise compliance programs or tech companies whose audit process specifies one of these tools.

How Lavawall® fits

Lavawall® occupies a different category from the SaaS-aimed GRC tools. The product itself is built and used internally by ThreeShield Information Security Corporation, an audit firm that has been writing the same kinds of audit findings for two decades. The frameworks Lavawall® covers reflect what MSP clients actually ask for: CMMC 2.0 for US defence-contractor clients, NIST CSF for Canadian Centre for Cybersecurity-aligned engagements, CIS Controls for cyber-insurance assessors, and the Canadian privacy bundle (PIPEDA plus Alberta PIPA plus BC PIPA plus Quebec Law 25) for regional compliance.

Because Lavawall® already runs on every endpoint as the patching, configuration-assessment, and breach-detection agent, evidence collection happens as a side-effect of normal operations. A new tenant inherits the standard control profile in minutes, with continuous evidence pulled from the agent, the M365 and Entra connectors, the Google Workspace connector, and the LAN-scan and domain-scan modules, without dozens of integration tokens to keep alive.

For MSPs whose clients operate in regulated Canadian industries, whether health authorities (BC HIA, Alberta HIA), securities firms (IIROC), accounting firms (CPA Canada), or critical infrastructure (NERC CIP), Lavawall® includes those frameworks natively rather than as custom controls.

Start your GRC wizard free →

Frequently asked

Is GRC the same as SOC 2 readiness?: SOC 2 readiness is one type of GRC engagement. Full GRC also includes risk assessment, policy management, control testing, evidence collection, and continuous monitoring across whatever frameworks apply to the client (CMMC 2.0, NIST CSF, CIS, HIPAA, PCI DSS, PIPEDA, and so on).
Why is multi-tenant GRC important for MSPs?: A single-tenant GRC platform requires a separate workspace and re-configured integrations per client. A multi-tenant platform like Lavawall® lets the MSP onboard a tenant in minutes, push a standard control profile, and produce co-branded reports without manual re-mapping per client.
How do I choose a GRC tool for CMMC 2.0?: For CMMC 2.0 specifically, look for a platform that maps NIST SP 800-171 controls directly to your endpoint and cloud configuration evidence and produces a System Security Plan (SSP) and a Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) you can share with your C3PAO. See our dedicated guide to the best CMMC 2.0 software for MSPs.
Can a single platform handle MSP-internal GRC and client-facing GRC?: Yes. Lavawall® is used both ways. Many MSPs use the same platform for their own SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audit and for delivering compliance-as-a-service to their clients.